|
1
|
- Dr Peter Crouch
- The Burghley Park Clinic
- & Great Western Laser Unit
|
|
2
|
- Typical symptomatic presentations
- Red face alone
- Flushing alone
- Mixed Red face AND Flushing
- Oh and … (Not Rosacea)
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- I first use Intense Pulsed Light
- Consent and test patch first
- Establish efficacy upon 4-6 week review
- Start conservatively
- Build up treatments
- Mix in photorejuvenation
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Three range I.P.L. with Clarithromycin
- 590nm 22 J/cm2 1st Pass
- 615nm 24 J/cm2 2nd Pass 90o
- 695nm 26 J/cm2 3rd Pass 90o
- Clarithromycin 250mg BD for two weeks
- Clarithromycin 25omg OD for two weeks
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- In order to target a specific tissue, one should select a wavelength
which is strongly absorbed by a chromophore present in that tissue.
- Most medical laser applications depend on the absorption of laser light
to heat the target tissue.
- To prevent undesirable thermal injury to adjacent tissue, light can be
applied in suitably timed pulses related to the size of the target
structure, according to the principle of Selective Photothermolysis.
|
|
9
|
- With proper selection of the wavelength, exposure time, and intensity of
the laser energy, the effect on the target tissue can be optimized and
undesirable collateral effect on adjacent tissue can hopefully be
minimized.
|
|
10
|
- 590/615/695 nm 22/24/26 J/cm2
- 590/615/695 nm 24/26/28 J/cm2
- 560/615/695 nm 22/24/26 J/cm2
- 560/615/695 nm 24/26/28 J/cm2
- 515/615/695 nm 22/24/26 J/cm2
- 515/615/695 nm 24/26/28 J/cm2
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- The Thermal Relaxation Time ( tr) of a given structure is the
time needed for 50% of the heat generated by absorption of a pulse of
energy to diffuse into the surrounding tissue and is proportional to the
square of the diameter of the target structure.
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- I don’t pre-flush with anything other
- than the Zimmer cool air blower
- Post IPL treatment (not YAG)
- I prescribe Clarithromycin
- as an angiogenesis inhibitor
- Dosage:- 250mg BD for two weeks
- Then 250mg OD for two weeks (then stop)
- Note – this is not licensed for this indication
|
|
16
|
- Consider Pulse Dye Laser
- Effective (in all but a few PDL resistant cases)
- Less even results
- IPL may even out uneven results after Pulse Dye Laser treatment even if
the initial condition was resistant.
|
|
17
|
- My face burns, heats up and “seems to swell…”
- Different triggers
- Time of day
- Hormonal cycle
|
|
18
|
- Nd:YAG 1064nm is FDA cleared for photorejuvenation
- Some of our patients are inevitably those who present with rosacea and
list flushing as a problem
- Some patients who opted for photorejuvenation reported that their
flushing got worse for 2-4 weeks…
- BUT crucially, then reported that it reduced below baseline after 6
weeks… and wanted more Thx
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Nd:YAG
- 1064nm
- 4-6 passes
- 10mm spot size
- 50ms pulse width
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Seb Derm can flare with IPL
- Tony Chu at The Hammersmith has been using Nlite Pulse Dye Laser for
calming down Seb Derm
- The Nlite Chaser (2.5J/cm2 – single pass) is used to prevent a Seb Derm
Flare next time
|
|
23
|
- Pulse Dye treatment as “a chaser” is an investment for next time
- Its all the rage at the moment with our clients
|
|
24
|
- I was recently asked to explain how I categorise patient factors (skin
type), treatment aims, treatment response, long term outcomes and
patient satisfaction when multiple conditions requiring different
treatments are all present.
- It is no simple task. Sometimes I think we have invented a new language
altogether. Although it is complicated, it attempts to assign numbers to subjective measures
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- FPST2 Skin type 2
- FL3 Mixed flushing and basal redness
- SD2 Moderate Seb Derm
- TE1 Mild surface redness
- PI2 Moderate dispigmentation
- TE1:IPL2;ITET2;ITR2;PTE2;RCO1;PTE3;PSO3
- Skin tolerated IPL well with little side effects and slight relapse,
patient v. happy
- FL3:NDY2;ITET2;ITR2;PTE2;RCO0;PTE3; PSO3
- Skin tolerated Nd:YAG well with little side effects and no relapse
patient v. happy
- SD2:PDL2;ITET2;ITR2;PTE2;RCO2; PTE3; PSO3
- Skin tolerated PDL well with little side effects but moderate relapse
patient v. happy
- PI2:KTP-1;ITET-1:ITR0;PTE0;RCO NA; PTE-1; PSO3
- Mild transient side effects from KTP, no response, innocent bystander
tissue damage patient not happy with this treatment but is happy overall
|
|
31
|
- Whilst a patient’s skin may be light tolerant, the condition requiring
treatment may not turn out to be light responsive. Often you can only
reach the conclusion that a patient sadly has a condition unresponsive
to IPL or laser only after test patching has established that the skin
can tolerate the treatment and after the skin condition does not respond
to the treatment.
- Patients may be able to tolerate one treatment modality and have a
condition that is very responsive to, for example, IPL for rosacea but
be unable to tolerate KTP laser treatment for pigmentation.
- Sometimes, one treatment modality is chosen, not because it is the most
effective but because although it is only moderately effective it can be
delivered as it is best tolerated.
|
|
32
|
- Rosacea is a very common condition
- It is not one condition
- Presentation is often symptom based
- Basal Redness
- Flushing
- Mixed picture
- Beware other conditions presenting as Rosacea
- Rosacea is treatable but be clear with patients what to expect and
develop & stick to clear & logical protocols. Document
contemporaneously.
|